In Australia many shock jocks, spin doctors and opportunist politicians love to incite against the Arabs and Muslims based on false and fabricated reasons and grounds!
As a result we had a number of tragedies in this country. However the media and politicians skillfully covered them up!!
A teenager and a 20-year-old man have been charged over the robbery and assault of an Indian national while he was using a telephone box in south Brisbane.
The incident created headlines as it was the second attack on an Indian overnight on Thursday in Brisbane, although police said the attacks weren't linked and were not racially motivated.
The 25-year-old man was using a telephone box in Macgregor, in Brisbane's south, at 10.40pm (AEST) on Thursday when he was allegedly set upon and punched to the side of the head and robbed of his wallet and cigarettes.
Police have charged two people with actual violence while in company over the incident.
Police said a 15-year-old boy would be dealt with under the Juvenile Justice Act while a 20-year-old Macgregor man was due to appear in the Brisbane Magistrates Court on Saturday.
In a separate incident, an Indian taxi driver was attacked about 2.40am (AEST) on Friday after an argument broke out with two men in Carindale, in Brisbane's southeast.
The men punched the driver in the face several times and smashed the car's windscreen.
Two men have been charged over that incident and are due to face court again in March.
There was a time when Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden were friends of the western corporate governments and of the western media outlets and their associates. Would you believe Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman was their friend too! They have escorted him out of the Egyptian prison to Afghanistan and then they airlifted him to the USAwithout any passport whatsoever! The Muslims (from Iran ) was the enemy of all of these parties. They were ably assisted by Salman Rushdie and his acid tongue. A tongue he directed against Islamic figures based on no foundation whatsoever. However, during that time and even today some vocal and visible Zionists groups promoted Satanic Verses like Torah under the guise of free speech while they themselves murdered free speech of David Irvin! Because he is a "holocaust denier" and "anti-Semite"!
Since then Rushdie has been used and manipulated by questionable groups of the western world to incite hatred and anger against Muslims and Arabs like that professional fraudNorma Khouri and carefully inventedDalia of "honor killing"! In the recent past Rusdie told the world that the Muslims are not good in bed. He is neither a doctor nor a sexologist. Yet, the West sold him like an expert of Islamic sex rather than exposing his own abject failure in his personal and sexual life. Would you believe The Dialogue of Padma and Salman as well as Transcript of conversation between Rushdie and Godsilenced them!
The same mob also imposed the so called modern Muslim Leader like the misfit, bitter and twisted, self confessed promiscuous and lesbian Ershad Manji. She is also an ardent lover of Israel . Her main gig was to rewrite Qur-an to accommodate promiscuity and homosexuality. Yet, the same people are murdering the right to free speech of David Duke PHD by boxing him in a corner with false and creative accusations. Does he have any right to speak and who decides?
Muslim and Arab bashing is the most popular sport in the town. For an example people like Bat Yeor, Melanie Phillips, Prof. Raphael Israeli and many more Zionists/"Jews/Israelis are borrowing entire chapters and verses from Adolph Hitler's Mein Kampf and using them against Arabs and Muslims.
Similarly the New Zealand Cartoonist lost his job for drawing a cartoon of the illegal and immoral apartheid wall. Yet, Fredric Tobin of Adelaide Institute has been haunted by the shameless and hypocritical enemy of free speech! We had Prophet Muhammad Cartoons (PBUH) for free speech and Piss Christ (PBUH) for arts.Now can we have a half naked Moses (PBUH) sucking cock for fun as an example of free speech? Anyway an honest attempt regarding cartons of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) failed to make any difference!
We are hearing some sort of rumor that the mighty Zionists are going to silence David Oldfield from the 2GB nightshift. They did the same to Glen Wheeler, on 2UE and poor Rihab Charida on the obscure Channel 31. A well-known blogger, webmaster, trade union and community activist like Faruque Ahmedalso facing the bulldozer, blockade and electronic terrorism. Where is the free speech may I ask?
Why the hell we are tolerating this terrorist state?
Further to Can you believe these animals? The whole world is paying through their hip pockets for Israeli terrorism! Why the hell we are tolerating this terrorist state? Who gave them any right to destabilize the world and disturb world peace?
DUBAI: The head of the United Nations atomic watchdog has warned that an attack on Iran over its nuclear program would turn the region into a fireball..
Mohamed ElBaradei also warned he would not be able to continue in his role as director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agencyif the Islamic republic were attacked.
"A military strike [against Iran] would in my opinion be worse than anything else … It would transform the Middle East region into a ball of fire," he said in an interview with Al-Arabiya television.
The New York Times on Friday quoted US officials as saying a big Israeli military exercise this month, involving more than 100 fighter jets in the Mediterranean, seemed to be a preparation for a potential strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.
In Athens, an official with the Greek Air Force's central command confirmed the substance of the report, stating that Greek units had taken part in "joint training exercises" with Israel off the Mediterranean island of Crete.
However, Israeli officials and independent experts said on Saturday that Israel's air force might be too small to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities.
The officials, who declined to be identified, said the air force would be unlikely to deliver more than a one-time blow to an Iranian nuclear program, which international experts believe may require as many as 1000 strikes to be destroyed.
"A hundred war planes are enough for a raid but they do not make for an air campaign, and that is what is needed to deal conclusively with Iran's capabilities," one official said.
Dr ElBaradei said any attack would simply harden Iran's position in its row with the West over its nuclear program.
"A military strike would spark the launch of an emergency program to make atomic weapons, with the support of all Iranians, including those living abroad," he said.
His stark comments came as Tehran stressed again that it would not negotiate with world powers over its nuclear program if it was required to suspend its uranium enrichment.
Dr ElBaradei did not believe there was an imminent risk of proliferation given the present status of Iran's nuclear program, and made it clear he would "not have a place" as the agency's head in the event of a military strike.
In other developments, a German magazine is reporting that a suspected nuclear site in Syria, built with the aid of North Korea and destroyed by Israel last September, was intended to support Iran's nuclear weapons program.
Der Spiegel says the Al-Kibar plant was to have been used as a temporary site for Iran to develop a nuclear bomb until it was able to do so on its own territory.
But the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is considering withdrawing his support for the Iranian program, the magazine reports in its next edition, due out today, quoting German secret service reports.
The site - to be inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency next week - was destroyed by Israeli war planes with Washington's support. Syria denied it had military purposes.
Based on the followings, we all gained the moral rights to prosecute, punish and attack Israel and Israeli supporters whenever, however and wherever we want.
This Zionist state was created through many illegal and immoral means including terrorism. Since then Israeli Holocaust, Holocaust continuum, The Iron Wall and Middle East Formula for Peace are valid threats to mankind. Recent comment of Deputy Israeli Prime Minister pushed the oil price $11.00 in one day. An Israel centric conflict with Iran may increase the oil price by $100.00! One must wonder why the hell because of one recalcitrant country and its endless terrorism the whole world has to be suffering endlessly?! Why the hell the media outlets are very silent about it?
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, sanjay pandey wrote: Re: [freeamericanow] Re: Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel?
UNO Charter : Chapter I Article 4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.Sanjay PandeyBangaloreKarnatakaIndia
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "bruceksim" wrote:
NONSENSE!!!!
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, sanjay pandey wrote: Re: [freeamericanow] Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel?
I am yet to start counting the number of articles of International Law and UNO is being violated by this threat of Israel.
Under the International Laws, since the threat has been made by a member of Govt of Israel, Iran and its friends have the legal right to do a pre-emptive strike on Israel to prevent it from carrying out its threat.
Unlike the Iraq war, this will be completely legal operation.Sanjay PandeyBangaloreKarnatakaIndia
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel? Israel Attack on Iran 'Unavoidable'-Olmert DeputyBy Dan Williams
06/06/08 "Reuters" - -- JERUSALEM - - An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday.
"If Iran continues with its programme for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.
"Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defence minister.
It was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from a member of Olmert's government, which, like the Bush administration, has preferred to hint at force as a last resort should U.N. Security Council sanctions be deemed a dead end.
Iran, which denies seeking nuclear weapons, has defied Western pressure to abandon its uranium enrichment projects. The leadership in Tehran has also threatened to retaliate against Israel -- believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal -- and U.S. targets in the Gulf for any attack on Iranian turf.
Mofaz also said in the interview that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map, "would disappear before Israel does."
Mofaz's remarks came as he and several other senior members of Olmert's Kadima Party prepare for a possible run for top office should a corruption scandal force the Israeli prime minister to step down.
Iranian-born Mofaz has been a main party rival of the Israeli prime minister, particularly following the 2006 elections when Olmert was forced to hand the defence portfolio to Labour, his main coalition partner, at Mofaz's expense.
Mofaz, who is also designated as a deputy prime minister, has remained privy to Israel's defence planning. He is a member of Olmert's security cabinet and leads regular strategic coordination talks with the U.S. State Department.
Israel sent warplanes to destroy Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981.
A similar Israeli sortie over Syria last September razed what the U.S. administration said was a nascent nuclear reactor built with North Korean help. Syria denied having any such facility.
Independent analysts have questioned, however, whether Israel's armed forces can take on Iran alone, as its nuclear sites are numerous, distant and well-fortified. (Editing by Ori Lewis and Charles Dick)
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments Comments (11) Comment (0)
Comment GuidelinesBe succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We'll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
Further to this open question, can we declare Bin Laden is Not Guilty based on lack of evidence against him and the existence of strong suspicion to the contrary?
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Yes, I believe you are right in that. The average American must have a scapegoat... that it couldn't be "one of us."Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "faris osman abdat" wrote: Actually he denied any responsibility............its the Americans who said he was guilty. --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Thanks, Jude. For what it's worth, that’s the way I see it.Bye,
Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote: I agree with you Jodie, agree 100% Jude --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "skankthumper2bc" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? And again a yawn here. USAma aka Tim Osmond DENIED having anything to do with 911 until after the FAKE CIA version appeared. See the different versions in the PHOTOS area of this group. Bin Laden is DEAD Jim. And has been for sometime. Ya can't drag a dialysis machine up a mountainside after all. --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote: It does not matter who is the power, what matters is the American people are being hurt. Jude --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Bush has never been "quite bright." Devious, yes, but not intelligent. It seems that Cheney has been the power in the Bush administration.Historically, the Bushes are a moneyed, devious lot. Barbara Bush is a descendent of Royality in Britain. I can't quite remember all the details... I would have to research again.I agree that 9/11 was the planned excuse for invading Iraq. When you look back at the events, Jewish NeoCon David Frum coined the play script phrase "Axis of Evil State," (Bush's State of the Union speech) to set the stage for invading Iraq and establishing a New World Order in the Middle East... American Imperialism !! The plan did not work too well. "They" did not do enough research and the Bush's New World Order has fallen apart at the seams.Anyway... those are my thoughts. Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote: Our government used him so they could invade Iraq and steal oil, which I may add we have not managed to steal much oil from yet either. Are we merely blunders? Jude --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Taxi, Osama took credit and got publicity for 9/11, but I don’t think he had anything to do with it Nor is Osama wanted for the crime. If he was responsible for 9/11, don't you think the U.S. government would have found him by now ??? I don't think they're seriously even looking for Osama !! It's been 7 years. Besides, even though his Daddy kicked him out, he's still of the Saudi Royal family, and Cheney and Bush bow to them.Do you agree ?? What do you think?? Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote: RE: [freeamericanow] Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? We will only not know the truth if we stop looking for it. Jude From: freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JodieSent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:31 AMTo: freeamericanow@yahoogroups.comSubject: [freeamericanow] Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Taxi, in taking credit for 9/11, Osama got a lot of publicity, (money/favors ??), and took the train off the "right" track. Because nothing adds up right. My real guess is that it was the Israelis. Could be, you know!! We will probably never know the real truth. Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "bruceksim" wrote: He admitted his guilt you bloody idioy!!
Cheers Bruce --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote: Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? I think Bush and his buddies were behind 9/11 !!
Jodie --- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "mukto_mona" wrote: I have asked this question and failed to find accurate answer. Obviously my question is who is guilty? Is it me or the mob? Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not? Which court, judge or jury found him guilty for what crime?
