Sunday, June 22, 2008

Why the hell we are tolerating this terrorist state?

Why the hell we are tolerating this terrorist state?


Further to Can you believe these animals? The whole world is paying through their hip pockets for Israeli terrorism! Why the hell we are tolerating this terrorist state? Who gave them any right to destabilize the world and disturb world peace?



Nuclear chief warns against strike on Iran


Email
Printer friendly version
Normal font
Large font
June 23, 2008


DUBAI: The head of the United Nations atomic watchdog has warned that an attack on Iran over its nuclear program would turn the region into a fireball..


Mohamed ElBaradei also warned he would not be able to continue in his role as director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agencyif the Islamic republic were attacked.


"A military strike [against Iran] would in my opinion be worse than anything else … It would transform the Middle East region into a ball of fire," he said in an interview with Al-Arabiya television.



The New York Times on Friday quoted US officials as saying a big Israeli military exercise this month, involving more than 100 fighter jets in the Mediterranean, seemed to be a preparation for a potential strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.



In Athens, an official with the Greek Air Force's central command confirmed the substance of the report, stating that Greek units had taken part in "joint training exercises" with Israel off the Mediterranean island of Crete.


However, Israeli officials and independent experts said on Saturday that Israel's air force might be too small to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities.


The officials, who declined to be identified, said the air force would be unlikely to deliver more than a one-time blow to an Iranian nuclear program, which international experts believe may require as many as 1000 strikes to be destroyed.


"A hundred war planes are enough for a raid but they do not make for an air campaign, and that is what is needed to deal conclusively with Iran's capabilities," one official said.


Dr ElBaradei said any attack would simply harden Iran's position in its row with the West over its nuclear program.


"A military strike would spark the launch of an emergency program to make atomic weapons, with the support of all Iranians, including those living abroad," he said.


His stark comments came as Tehran stressed again that it would not negotiate with world powers over its nuclear program if it was required to suspend its uranium enrichment.


Dr ElBaradei did not believe there was an imminent risk of proliferation given the present status of Iran's nuclear program, and made it clear he would "not have a place" as the agency's head in the event of a military strike.


In other developments, a German magazine is reporting that a suspected nuclear site in Syria, built with the aid of North Korea and destroyed by Israel last September, was intended to support Iran's nuclear weapons program.


Der Spiegel says the Al-Kibar plant was to have been used as a temporary site for Iran to develop a nuclear bomb until it was able to do so on its own territory.


But the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is considering withdrawing his support for the Iranian program, the magazine reports in its next edition, due out today, quoting German secret service reports.


The site - to be inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency next week - was destroyed by Israeli war planes with Washington's support. Syria denied it had military purposes.


Agence France Presse, Reuters

Friday, June 13, 2008

We Got the Right to Punish Israel

We Got the Right to Punish Israel


Based on the followings, we all gained the moral rights to prosecute, punish and attack Israel and Israeli supporters whenever, however and wherever we want.

Why do we have to suffer for Zionist Israel?

Further to Gutless Council and Media the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq was to secure Israel and an early American withdrawal from Iraq will hurt Israel. The invasion was also based on 935 lies.

This Zionist state was created through many illegal and immoral means including terrorism. Since then Israeli Holocaust, Holocaust continuum, The Iron Wall and Middle East Formula for Peace are valid threats to mankind. Recent comment of Deputy Israeli Prime Minister pushed the oil price $11.00 in one day. An Israel centric conflict with Iran may increase the oil price by $100.00! One must wonder why the hell because of one recalcitrant country and its endless terrorism the whole world has to be suffering endlessly?! Why the hell the media outlets are very silent about it?


--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, sanjay pandey wrote:
Re: [freeamericanow] Re: Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel?

UNO Charter : Chapter I Article 4.
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.Sanjay PandeyBangaloreKarnatakaIndia




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "bruceksim" wrote:
NONSENSE!!!!



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, sanjay pandey wrote:
Re: [freeamericanow] Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel?

I am yet to start counting the number of articles of International Law and UNO is being violated by this threat of Israel.

Under the International Laws, since the threat has been made by a member of Govt of Israel, Iran and its friends have the legal right to do a pre-emptive strike on Israel to prevent it from carrying out its threat.

Unlike the Iraq war, this will be completely legal operation.Sanjay PandeyBangaloreKarnatakaIndia


--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:


Should Iran Launch Preemptive Strike On Israel? Israel Attack on Iran 'Unavoidable'-Olmert DeputyBy Dan Williams

06/06/08 "Reuters" - -- JERUSALEM - - An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday.

"If Iran continues with its programme for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.

"Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defence minister.

It was the most explicit threat yet against Iran from a member of Olmert's government, which, like the Bush administration, has preferred to hint at force as a last resort should U.N. Security Council sanctions be deemed a dead end.

Iran, which denies seeking nuclear weapons, has defied Western pressure to abandon its uranium enrichment projects. The leadership in Tehran has also threatened to retaliate against Israel -- believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal -- and U.S. targets in the Gulf for any attack on Iranian turf.

Mofaz also said in the interview that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map, "would disappear before Israel does."

Mofaz's remarks came as he and several other senior members of Olmert's Kadima Party prepare for a possible run for top office should a corruption scandal force the Israeli prime minister to step down.

Iranian-born Mofaz has been a main party rival of the Israeli prime minister, particularly following the 2006 elections when Olmert was forced to hand the defence portfolio to Labour, his main coalition partner, at Mofaz's expense.

Mofaz, who is also designated as a deputy prime minister, has remained privy to Israel's defence planning. He is a member of Olmert's security cabinet and leads regular strategic coordination talks with the U.S. State Department.

Israel sent warplanes to destroy Iraq's nuclear reactor in 1981.

A similar Israeli sortie over Syria last September razed what the U.S. administration said was a nascent nuclear reactor built with North Korean help. Syria denied having any such facility.

Independent analysts have questioned, however, whether Israel's armed forces can take on Iran alone, as its nuclear sites are numerous, distant and well-fortified.
(Editing by Ori Lewis and Charles Dick)


Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comments (11) Comment (0)

Comment GuidelinesBe succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.

See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We'll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.


Send Page To a Friend

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Can we declare Bin Laden is Not Guilty?

Can we declare Bin Laden is Not Guilty?



Further to this open question, can we declare Bin Laden is Not Guilty based on lack of evidence against him and the existence of strong suspicion to the contrary?



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?


Yes, I believe you are right in that. The average American must have a scapegoat... that it couldn't be "one of us."Jodie



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "faris osman abdat" wrote:

Actually he denied any responsibility............its the Americans who said he was guilty.



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?

Thanks, Jude. For what it's worth, that’s the way I see it.Bye,

Jodie





--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote:

I agree with you Jodie, agree 100%

Jude





--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "skankthumper2bc" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?

And again a yawn here. USAma aka Tim Osmond DENIED having anything to do with 911 until after the FAKE CIA version appeared. See the different versions in the PHOTOS area of this group. Bin Laden is DEAD Jim. And has been for sometime. Ya can't drag a dialysis machine up a mountainside after all.




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote:

It does not matter who is the power, what matters is the American people are being hurt.

Jude



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?

Bush has never been "quite bright." Devious, yes, but not intelligent. It seems that Cheney has been the power in the Bush administration.Historically, the Bushes are a moneyed, devious lot. Barbara Bush is a descendent of Royality in Britain. I can't quite remember all the details... I would have to research again.I agree that 9/11 was the planned excuse for invading Iraq. When you look back at the events, Jewish NeoCon David Frum coined the play script phrase "Axis of Evil State," (Bush's State of the Union speech) to set the stage for invading Iraq and establishing a New World Order in the Middle East... American Imperialism !! The plan did not work too well. "They" did not do enough research and the Bush's New World Order has fallen apart at the seams.Anyway... those are my thoughts.

Jodie



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote:


Our government used him so they could invade Iraq and steal oil, which I may add we have not managed to steal much oil from yet either. Are we merely blunders?

Jude




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?


Taxi, Osama took credit and got publicity for 9/11, but I don’t think he had anything to do with it Nor is Osama wanted for the crime. If he was responsible for 9/11, don't you think the U.S. government would have found him by now ??? I don't think they're seriously even looking for Osama !! It's been 7 years. Besides, even though his Daddy kicked him out, he's still of the Saudi Royal family, and Cheney and Bush bow to them.Do you agree ?? What do you think??

Jodie




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jude" wrote:
RE: [freeamericanow] Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?


We will only not know the truth if we stop looking for it.

Jude





From: freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JodieSent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:31 AMTo: freeamericanow@yahoogroups.comSubject: [freeamericanow] Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?



Taxi, in taking credit for 9/11, Osama got a lot of publicity, (money/favors ??), and took the train off the "right" track. Because nothing adds up right. My real guess is that it was the Israelis. Could be, you know!! We will probably never know the real truth.

Jodie



--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "bruceksim" wrote:


He admitted his guilt you bloody idioy!!

Cheers Bruce




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?


I think Bush and his buddies were behind 9/11 !!

Jodie




--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "mukto_mona" wrote:


I have asked this question and failed to find accurate answer. Obviously my question is who is guilty?

Is it me or the mob?


Osama Bin Laden is guilty or Not?


Which court, judge or jury found him guilty for what crime?

Please answer the question with objectivity and reality. Childish, offensive, insane or profane answers are not welcome.


You are welcome to examine these links should you wish.
Crowd swells for a shivering dawn
They fought for two sausages!
In Sadr City, Basic Services Falter
Retracing diggers' path in France for Anzac Day
Who are these enemies?
Captain Bush, Blair and Howard
McCain's "Spiritual Guide" Wants America to Destroy Islam?

Source: Free America Now

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Count Down of Free Speech

Count Down of Free Speech


Further to The Illustrious Prime Minister of Australia John Howard and Victory to Peoples Power, today (Thursday, July 26, 2007) my blogs were unblocked. I have spoken to Clive Robertson of Radio 2UE last night about this issue too. Let’s se how long my free speech survives!


The Illustrious Prime Minister of Australia John Howard


Further to Victory to Peoples Power, the illustrious Prime Minister of Australia misused and abused anti-Terror legislations and conspired to strip search of the New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clerk. He did so to make Israel happy. He also misused and abused the same legislations to strip search the Papua New Guinea Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare!

Philip Ruddock, the filthy Attorney General of Australia `virtually' asked his daughter to open her legs for an Israeli child molester for power as demonstrated in credible links of Legs are Open for Business.

A few thugs also dared to conspire with the ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organisation) against Mr. Faruque Ahmed of the infamous Minister for Transport! Initially the ASIO officials were aggressive towards Mr. Ahmed. However, eventually they became very polite to him and refrained from asking any silly questions. At one stage they said, “Faruque how can we keep Australia safe”? Faruque pointed out a few stories from two well-known Sydney dailies and said, “if you continue to incite prejudice, bigotry, racism and sectarianism like these ones based on innuendos and anecdotes, how could you keep the country safe”? They agreed with him and said, “you know the media outlets make money in this way”. Faruque’s response was, “well, the choice should be clear - either money or safety”.

Right now Dr. Mohamed Haneef and many people have fallen to the Howardian trap of racism and sectarianism to reconfirm the Australian Values.

Mr. Keating said Mr Howard, like Hitler, was a nationalist, not a patriot. Former Liberal Party boss and Prime Minister of Australia also said similar things about ‘little John’.

Margo Kingston’s Web diary is also interesting.

One must wonder, who and why blocked a few blogs mentioned in this link?


Faruque Ahmed, Mob: 041 091 4118
Moderator
Free America Now
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/
Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Who really needs “protection” – Ali or her critics?

Who really needs “protection” – Ali or her critics?



Sunday 3rd June 2007, I went to the City Recital Hall and politely started to distribute my leaflet, "THE POLITICS OF ARAB AND MUSLIM BASHING" outside the $35 per person lecture.


Within ten minutes a police officer amongst the approximately twenty strong contingent, courteously asked me to provide him a copy of my leaflet. He read the item and then placed it in his hip pocket. Soon after most of the security guards present asked me for a copy of the same material and I made it available to them. Almost all of those security guards had a very polite exchange with me regarding Ayaan Hirshi Ali. At the outset, it appeared a common sense approach by those police officers and guards, their interaction with me was an example of the Aussie ‘fair go’ attitude at work. But, the ‘boss’ from inside the hall started to put pressure on the security guards to be nasty and forceful with me. The police officers did not intervene as I was not in breach of any law. The embarrassed leader of the private security said, "Mate, you are breaching the peace here – I have to ask you to move". My startled response was, "You know I don't believe in violence and I have not done anything to incite violence, therefore you must not accuse me of such fictitious grounds”. He then said, "Your materials are offending some people inside and they are getting very hot under their collars – they might attack you". I responded by saying, "That would be their problem and how come they are unable to accept any fair criticism and are threatening ME with violence?"


The embarrassed, yet reasonable security guy who by no means would be risking his security licence to be a paid thug or anyone’s hired, violent stooge. He said, "Look just move fifty meters from the hall and you will be fine". I said, "I don't have to move, but, for the sake of peace I will walk an extra mile".


However, during the period I was leafleting there, I observed that there were a few different types of people attending the lecture. One group refuses to know you if you do not look like them and walked straight past me. Another group treats words like ‘Arab’ or ‘Muslim’ which were in my leaflet like poison! This second grouping like the first refuse to get involved or to even acknowledge you. The third grouping are in between – they are struggling to find their positions.


One over excited, blustering, middle-aged woman said to me, "Your materials are wrong". I replied, "Why"? She then said, "Look, UTS Professor Jamila Hussain is wrong and it is a fact (that she’s wrong)". She attempted to support her opinion by pointing out Professor Jamila's quote that I had used in that same leaflet. I responded to her, "You are presenting your opinion only and it’s not a `fact' to dismiss my materials. I myself regard Professor Jamila Hussain’s statement here as valid". She roared at me in frustration, "Are you calling me a liar?" I said, "Why are you so militant in nature and how come you are not presenting your argument in a logical manner?" She then continued in her provoking way, "Are you one of those killers who are hunting for her"? I replied, "You are reminding me of those brave child killer Israelis who have been murdering unarmed Palestinian children in their kindergartens, schoolyards and backyards with machine guns, apache helicopters and F18s."


Another cranky, flustered old woman approached me too. The security guards found her exchange with me hilarious and said to me later, "Is she your first critic"?


She begun with, “I am a Dutch, I know everything and you know nothing. Are you Australian? Where do you come from? She (Ayaan) is educated. She will fix violent Muslims". With a giggle I said, "That's why your good friends are supporting and financing her. They will dump her after her ‘use by date’ – you watch". She continued, "You should not be allowed to talk in this country – you should be banned."


The irony here is that the security asked me to move because they feared for my safety. In reality, we need protection from the supporters of Ayaan and not the other way around, where as the entire tour of Ayaan is claimed to be based on her needing around-the-clock security!


Is this a case of “violence begets violence” or more precisely, does it confirm my point that the financial backers of Ali are using her to disguise their own violence against Muslims and Muslim countries around the world?


During the initial stages of reporting of Ali by the Australian media the articles were balanced and they also quoted a number of local Muslims who were critical of Ayaan’s blanket condemnation of Islam based on her incorrect stand and faulty reasoning.


After a couple of days of her appearance in Australia the screws were turned, the clear bias emerged and her monologues were selectively used to create deliberate confusion, uproar and cause injury to the Islamic community.


Surely, the Sydney Writers Festival should be about dialogues and robust discussions. That was the reason I distributed my flyer to generate open and fair debate. In the current atmosphere in Australia it would appear the only dialogue possible now is via the internet and not out in the open in real life.


Are Ayaan Hirshi Ali, Ershad Manji, Norma Khoury and a few more confused, yet conveniently compliant soles being used as a distraction away from many burning issues one of which is the longest running concentration camp known to mankind, located in the occupied Palestine? Because, this slow motion Israeli holocaust in Palestine is much more painful than the former one!

Friday, June 1, 2007

THE POLITICS OF MUSLIM AND ARAB BASHING

THE POLITICS OF MUSLIM AND ARAB BASHING
SYDNEY WRITERS FESTIVAL “PIN-UP GIRL” SHOULD BE READ IN CONTEXT


Ayaan Hirshi Ali, an international guest of the Sydney Writers Festival in 2007 is feted as a persecuted victim of Islam by some Western feminists, intellectuals and the media of Australia. As a progressive Muslim in Australia, I urge attendees at the SWF to take a closer look. It is my belief that Ali has become a pawn of the Right Wing establishment, which promotes racism, pro-American military aggression and pro-Israeli Zionism.

The Labor Party of Holland challenged Ali for making a political career based on lies, prejudice and bigotry – the very things she claimed to be fighting. After September 11, 2001 Dutch politics moved to the right. Sixty percent of the Dutch electorate voted for the far right politician Pim Fortyn in the wake of 9/11. Fortyn was assassinated by an animal rights activist and NOT by a supporter of Islam. Yet, the media focused on Islamic fundamentalism in their coverage of the crime. Dutch government Minister Rita Verdonk took up the anti-Muslim crusade and deported many asylum seekers in Holland back to their country of origin and handed over the reports compiled on why they sought asylum. This exposed asylum seekers to further dangers. A number of them have since been killed. Verdonk denied handing over these reports until she was exposed by some journalists. Verdonk now wants to return Iranian homosexuals to Iran from Holland with full knowledge they may be killed. Ayaan Hirshi Ali is politically aligned with these reactionary forces.

Many Dutch people are happy that Ayaan was kicked out from the Dutch Parliament and since she has left for the United States they do not want her back in their country. They also want to revoke her citizenship. However since arriving in the USA Ayaan has been adopted by the pro-Israeli lobby and the neo-Cons as a valuable weapon in their anti-Muslim crusade. Just like former anti-Vietnam War activists and writers who deserted the progressive Left are now widely promoted in the establishment media to defend the Bush line on Iraq, former Muslims like Ayaan Hirshi Ali, Ershad Manji and others are now promoted to discredit Islam generally, but worse to promote and stir the fans of Western prejudice and ignorance.


Below are a few quotes regarding Ali.

In answer to an email I sent exposing her real agenda, a reply from the Sydney Writers Festival organizing committee noted, “… Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s views are controversial and that the right wing media regularly cite her views to promote their agenda. We have discussed this in depth with her publisher …”

The University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Islamic law lecturer Jamila Hussain said Hirsi Ali's ideas were extreme and stigmatised Muslims. "I think she'd be better staying where she came from," Ms Hussain said. "I've read enough of her thoughts. It's a narrow and radical opinion, and I don't agree with it. She's obviously had some dreadful experiences, but they're not typical."

Nada Roude, a young female spokesperson from the NSW Islamic Council, said Hirsi Ali's comments on the prophet Mohammed were a "no-go zone". By this she meant her criticisms (on the subject of paediphilia) were without foundation, according to non-Arab, non-Muslim scholars of religious history. (The Australian May 29, 2007)

Islamic education consultant Silma Ihram said the writer's perception of the religion was inaccurate. “(She) has an axe to grind due to her background suffering from unfortunate Somali tribal practices,” Ms Ihram said.

“Combine that with a desire for wealth as a Somali European migrant and it's natural for her to achieve both by publicly slandering Islam and obtaining immediate media attention.” Comment of the Islamic friendship Association spokesman Keysar Trad (Daily Telegraph May 29, 2007)

Ayaan’s anti-Muslim diatribe should be read in the context of the Iraq War, Howard’s “War on Terror”, the Cronulla riots, talkback radio and the coming APEC talks. There is a deliberate attempt to stereotype Muslim and Arab Australians. Even those who oppose the ‘divide and rule’ tactics of the State let their guard down when an articulate Third World women is speaking about the “backward” and so-called “anti-Modern nature of Islam. They will not scrutinize Ayaan’s political agenda in the same way they might Piers Ackerman or Gerard Henderson – even if she is essentially saying the same thing.

Sure there are “rat bags” and “fundamentalists” within the global Islamic religion and culture. But for thousands of years the Islamic culture co-existed with Jewish people and their culture. It is only now with the rise of political Zionism and the State of Israel, defended by the American Right and US Fundamentalists, that fakes such as Ayaan and others are given prominence with their “Islam is Seventh Century and anti-Modern” line.

Have a look at some of the “extremist” positions from the pro-Zionist camp below and then ask yourself is Ayaan and her supporters correct in ‘casting the first stone’ only against Islam:

“[in the event of sex between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman] the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew." (Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, page 87)

"We Jews are going to bring war on Germany." (David Brown, President of American Hebrew, in 1934, quoted in Edmonson's I Testify, page 188).

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." (The Chicago Jewish Sentinel, October 8, 1942).

“The seed [children] of Christians valued same as the seed of a beast”. (Kethuboth [3b]).

”It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile." (Sepher Ikkarim III c25)

"We Jews have spoiled the blood of all the races of Europe. Taken as a whole, everything is Jewdified. Our ideas animate everything. Our spirit reigns over the world. We are the Lords" (Dr. Kurt Munzer, The Way to Zion).

”We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands." (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 152, 155, and 147).

Faruque Ahmed, Email: union_faruque@yahoo.com.au Mobile: 041 091 4118

Monday, May 28, 2007

The New Weapons of Mass Destruction

The New Weapons of Mass Destruction

Ayaan Hirshi Ali is one of the new ‘weapons of mass destruction’. She started a career out of lying. Ayaan obtained her Dutch citizenship and made documentaries based on false and fabricated materials. Now she is exposed, lost her position in the Dutch Parliament and her citizenship supposed to be revoked too.

However, she found a warm place in the warmongering Bush lead US administration and the neo-cons are giving her plenty of support and publicity. The Sydney Writers' Festivals response

I hope prejudice and bigotry will be defeated by truth and reality and none of us should fell for any of them.

Thanks in advance.

Faruque Ahmed
Moderator
Free America Now
May 29, 2007
is fair and proper in their dealings with her.